W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > Strong ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of Strong ETag broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
Strong ETag is used by 15.4% of all the websites.
Strong ETag is used by 11.2% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
15.4%
United States
11.2%
Germany
17.5%
Japan
13.0%
France
9.5%
Netherlands
14.5%
Russian Federation
5.5%
Italy
8.2%
United Kingdom
13.4%
Brazil
19.6%
India
26.4%
Poland
11.6%
Singapore
18.5%
Spain
10.0%
Turkey
18.0%
Canada
14.8%
Czech Republic
7.1%
China
18.1%
Ireland
7.9%
Iran
12.6%
Australia
14.0%
South Korea
4.9%
Viet Nam
9.1%
Belgium
7.1%
Switzerland
12.3%
Denmark
20.5%
Finland
14.5%
Indonesia
21.3%
Ukraine
13.0%
Romania
19.2%
Hungary
8.0%
Sweden
11.4%
South Africa
10.6%
Slovakia
6.4%
Lithuania
29.4%
Austria
13.0%
Taiwan
12.7%
Thailand
10.4%
Bulgaria
11.7%
Argentina
17.1%
Portugal
5.5%
Belarus
6.2%
Malaysia
18.9%
Israel
9.8%
Chile
10.0%
Kazakhstan
16.7%
Estonia
7.4%
Slovenia
16.1%
Norway
12.1%
Croatia
7.7%
Greece
11.3%
Serbia
14.2%
New Zealand
13.6%
Bangladesh
16.1%
Latvia
8.5%
Mexico
19.1%
United Arab Emirates
24.6%
Moldova
12.7%
Uzbekistan
12.4%
Luxembourg
13.3%
Georgia
11.6%
Iceland
18.9%
Colombia
23.8%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.6%
Saudi Arabia
18.7%
Nepal
13.4%
Peru
14.1%
Uruguay
21.4%
Tunisia
17.3%
Pakistan
11.2%
Mongolia
14.0%
Kyrgyzstan
5.8%
Kenya
8.4%
Ecuador
15.5%
Egypt
20.8%
Philippines
17.9%
Algeria
9.8%
Azerbaijan
8.2%
Bahrain
19.8%
Costa Rica
12.6%
Tanzania
2.7%
North Macedonia
12.7%
Cyprus
8.3%
Paraguay
14.1%
Armenia
8.8%
Morocco
19.3%
Seychelles
0.8%
Bolivia
17.2%
Venezuela
25.5%
Nigeria
22.2%
Jordan
14.8%
Sri Lanka
15.8%
Qatar
16.6%
Turkmenistan
12.4%
Ethiopia
14.1%
Oman
17.3%
Rwanda
7.0%
Albania
11.4%
Panama
13.1%
San Marino
2.2%
Tajikistan
9.5%
Syria
11.6%
Palestine
8.3%
Cambodia
12.5%
Ghana
6.8%
Cuba
14.7%
Libya
6.6%
Guatemala
26.0%
Kuwait
17.3%
Zambia
6.9%
Bhutan
9.4%
Angola
14.1%
Lebanon
20.4%
Myanmar
7.5%
Uganda
10.8%
Namibia
9.1%
Mozambique
10.0%
Senegal
12.3%
Cote d'Ivoire
10.9%
Zimbabwe
10.1%
Dominican Republic
23.7%
Mauritius
12.2%
Honduras
30.2%
El Salvador
15.5%
Malta
9.0%
Andorra
10.4%
Cameroon
13.2%
Nicaragua
11.4%
Montenegro
12.1%
Brunei Darussalam
9.7%
Burkina Faso
9.0%
Monaco
7.9%
Malawi
5.9%
Iraq
17.3%
Liechtenstein
13.5%
Laos
15.7%
Botswana
26.6%
Yemen
4.8%
Madagascar
17.7%
Jamaica
24.7%
Kosovo
14.8%
Timor-Leste
9.2%
Benin
8.0%
Maldives
4.1%
Mali
13.5%
Bahamas
16.9%
Togo
9.0%
Mauritania
16.9%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
1.6%
Trinidad and Tobago
12.7%
Belize
11.3%
Cape Verde
11.5%
Suriname
17.5%
Papua New Guinea
12.5%
Afghanistan
27.5%
Fiji
27.5%
Lesotho
13.3%
Gabon
2.4%
CuraƧao
25.0%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0%
Eswatini
18.8%
Samoa
6.2%
Barbados
9.7%
Djibouti
7.1%
North Korea
14.8%
Somalia
25.9%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
8.0%
Burundi
12.5%
Niger
0%
Saint Lucia
11.1%
Dominica
23.5%
Gambia
41.2%
Tonga
29.4%
Vanuatu
6.7%
Sudan
21.4%
Guyana
18.2%
Solomon Islands
0%
Guinea
0%
Haiti
10.0%
W3Techs.com, 25 September 2025
Percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
Strong ETag
Category: Site Elements
A strong ETag is an HTTP header field for validation of cached web pages, that indicates a byte-for-byte identical page in the cache.
Website: w3.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2025 Q-Success