W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > Strong ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of Strong ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
Strong ETag is used by 16.0% of all the websites.
Strong ETag is used by 11.5% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
16.0%
United States
11.5%
Germany
20.2%
Japan
12.9%
France
10.1%
Netherlands
15.8%
Russian Federation
5.9%
United Kingdom
13.6%
Italy
9.8%
Brazil
20.2%
India
27.2%
Poland
11.8%
Singapore
18.6%
Spain
10.1%
Turkey
18.1%
Canada
15.1%
Czech Republic
7.2%
China
17.9%
Australia
13.6%
South Korea
5.5%
Belgium
6.8%
Viet Nam
9.8%
Switzerland
11.9%
Iran
10.3%
Ireland
10.3%
Denmark
21.3%
Finland
15.4%
Indonesia
21.3%
Ukraine
13.1%
Romania
17.8%
Hungary
8.2%
Sweden
12.0%
South Africa
10.7%
Slovakia
5.7%
Lithuania
31.9%
Austria
12.4%
Bulgaria
12.5%
Taiwan
12.4%
Thailand
11.1%
Argentina
17.8%
Portugal
5.5%
Malaysia
20.9%
Belarus
5.9%
Israel
10.9%
Chile
11.0%
Estonia
7.0%
Slovenia
17.0%
Kazakhstan
12.0%
Norway
12.3%
Croatia
8.1%
Greece
11.6%
Serbia
14.8%
New Zealand
13.5%
Bangladesh
14.1%
Latvia
8.4%
Mexico
18.3%
United Arab Emirates
20.7%
Moldova
11.7%
Uzbekistan
12.9%
Iceland
17.1%
Luxembourg
13.5%
Georgia
11.3%
Colombia
22.1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.2%
Saudi Arabia
17.5%
Nepal
14.0%
Peru
13.3%
Uruguay
21.2%
Tunisia
18.7%
Pakistan
11.6%
Mongolia
14.2%
Kyrgyzstan
6.3%
Philippines
18.0%
Kenya
7.9%
Ecuador
15.6%
Bahrain
18.0%
Algeria
10.1%
Azerbaijan
8.5%
Egypt
21.2%
Costa Rica
13.9%
Tanzania
3.8%
North Macedonia
12.4%
Armenia
9.0%
Paraguay
13.6%
Cyprus
10.0%
Bolivia
16.6%
Morocco
20.1%
Nigeria
21.9%
Venezuela
26.5%
Seychelles
1.3%
Jordan
14.6%
Sri Lanka
15.8%
Ethiopia
12.8%
Oman
17.5%
Turkmenistan
11.9%
Albania
12.6%
Qatar
13.8%
Rwanda
8.4%
San Marino
2.1%
Palestine
6.4%
Tajikistan
8.8%
Panama
12.2%
Syria
9.4%
Cambodia
15.2%
Libya
8.0%
Ghana
6.3%
Zambia
6.0%
Kuwait
17.0%
Cuba
14.7%
Guatemala
26.2%
Myanmar
10.1%
Angola
14.5%
Lebanon
20.1%
Bhutan
6.8%
Mozambique
8.6%
Namibia
9.1%
Uganda
9.6%
Senegal
14.2%
Cote d'Ivoire
9.9%
Belize
5.2%
Mauritius
12.5%
Zimbabwe
13.3%
Andorra
9.9%
Honduras
28.5%
Dominican Republic
26.4%
Malta
10.5%
El Salvador
19.2%
Monaco
5.6%
Montenegro
13.0%
Nicaragua
14.5%
Cameroon
12.9%
Iraq
17.4%
Burkina Faso
11.1%
Brunei Darussalam
10.8%
Malawi
7.5%
Liechtenstein
11.0%
Laos
12.7%
Yemen
7.7%
Botswana
28.9%
Madagascar
15.2%
Jamaica
25.5%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
2.3%
Afghanistan
30.2%
Kosovo
12.3%
Maldives
3.9%
Timor-Leste
8.0%
Bahamas
17.6%
Benin
9.7%
Mali
12.5%
Mauritania
16.7%
Suriname
16.7%
Cape Verde
12.3%
Papua New Guinea
9.8%
Trinidad and Tobago
13.1%
Togo
10.3%
Barbados
9.4%
CuraƧao
27.7%
Fiji
4.4%
Lesotho
11.4%
Eswatini
17.5%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0%
Gabon
2.6%
Somalia
29.4%
Samoa
9.7%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3.4%
North Korea
10.7%
Sudan
19.2%
Niger
8.3%
Djibouti
13.0%
Burundi
9.1%
Gambia
27.8%
Tonga
29.4%
Saint Lucia
12.5%
Vanuatu
7.1%
Guyana
16.7%
Guinea
9.1%
Solomon Islands
10.0%
W3Techs.com, 12 February 2026
Percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
Strong ETag
Category: Site Elements
A strong ETag is an HTTP header field for validation of cached web pages, that indicates a byte-for-byte identical page in the cache.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success