W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > Strong ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of Strong ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
Strong ETag is used by 16.4% of all the websites.
Strong ETag is used by 11.8% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
16.4%
United States
11.8%
Germany
20.9%
Japan
13.1%
France
10.4%
Netherlands
16.8%
Russian Federation
6.1%
United Kingdom
14.4%
Italy
10.1%
Brazil
21.0%
India
28.0%
Poland
12.4%
Singapore
19.1%
Spain
10.6%
Turkey
19.0%
Canada
15.8%
Czech Republic
7.3%
China
18.2%
Australia
14.7%
South Korea
5.9%
Belgium
6.9%
Viet Nam
10.5%
Switzerland
12.5%
Iran
11.3%
Denmark
21.6%
Ireland
11.4%
Finland
15.8%
Indonesia
21.9%
Ukraine
13.3%
Romania
19.7%
Hungary
8.3%
South Africa
11.1%
Sweden
12.3%
Slovakia
5.7%
Lithuania
33.7%
Austria
12.2%
Taiwan
12.5%
Bulgaria
11.7%
Thailand
11.7%
Argentina
18.1%
Portugal
5.6%
Malaysia
22.1%
Belarus
6.3%
Israel
11.4%
Chile
11.3%
Estonia
7.1%
Slovenia
17.2%
Kazakhstan
14.7%
Norway
12.7%
Croatia
8.1%
Greece
11.6%
Serbia
15.2%
Bangladesh
13.8%
New Zealand
13.5%
Cyprus
48.4%
United Arab Emirates
28.4%
Mexico
18.3%
Latvia
8.7%
Moldova
12.8%
Uzbekistan
13.0%
Iceland
18.0%
Georgia
11.8%
Colombia
24.4%
Luxembourg
13.9%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.1%
Saudi Arabia
18.4%
Nepal
15.1%
Peru
13.8%
Uruguay
21.1%
Tunisia
19.4%
Pakistan
11.7%
Mongolia
14.8%
Kyrgyzstan
6.8%
Kenya
8.3%
Ecuador
16.0%
Philippines
19.5%
Algeria
10.5%
Egypt
22.9%
Azerbaijan
8.9%
Bahrain
17.4%
Costa Rica
14.3%
Tanzania
8.9%
North Macedonia
13.0%
Armenia
10.5%
Paraguay
13.4%
Bolivia
18.1%
Morocco
21.6%
Nigeria
22.2%
Venezuela
27.9%
Jordan
15.2%
Seychelles
1.5%
Sri Lanka
16.3%
Oman
17.7%
Ethiopia
13.8%
Rwanda
9.1%
Turkmenistan
12.1%
Albania
13.2%
Qatar
14.6%
San Marino
2.0%
Palestine
8.2%
Tajikistan
10.6%
Panama
13.4%
Cambodia
15.4%
Syria
11.1%
Libya
9.1%
Ghana
6.7%
Zambia
7.6%
Cuba
14.8%
Kuwait
18.4%
Myanmar
13.3%
Guatemala
27.3%
Angola
15.2%
Bhutan
7.7%
Lebanon
22.1%
Uganda
12.0%
Namibia
8.9%
Mozambique
9.8%
Senegal
15.5%
Cote d'Ivoire
10.6%
Mauritius
13.3%
Zimbabwe
13.0%
Honduras
30.1%
Belize
5.3%
Dominican Republic
28.1%
Andorra
10.6%
Malta
10.7%
Nicaragua
14.5%
El Salvador
20.0%
Monaco
6.9%
Montenegro
13.8%
Iraq
17.1%
Cameroon
13.9%
Burkina Faso
10.7%
Brunei Darussalam
10.9%
Liechtenstein
10.7%
Malawi
7.6%
Laos
14.6%
Botswana
27.7%
Yemen
6.8%
Madagascar
17.1%
Jamaica
28.0%
Afghanistan
25.9%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
0%
Kosovo
12.0%
Benin
11.5%
Maldives
5.2%
Timor-Leste
7.9%
Mali
14.7%
Bahamas
16.2%
Barbados
7.0%
Mauritania
15.5%
Papua New Guinea
10.6%
Suriname
15.2%
Cape Verde
12.3%
Trinidad and Tobago
13.6%
Togo
10.3%
CuraƧao
26.9%
Eswatini
20.0%
Fiji
6.7%
Lesotho
11.1%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0%
Gabon
2.8%
Somalia
28.6%
Samoa
6.1%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3.3%
North Korea
10.3%
Djibouti
7.4%
Niger
7.4%
Sudan
17.4%
Burundi
9.1%
Gambia
31.6%
Tonga
26.3%
Saint Lucia
18.8%
Vanuatu
7.1%
Guyana
23.1%
Guinea
27.3%
Solomon Islands
9.1%
W3Techs.com, 5 April 2026
Percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
Strong ETag
Category: Site Elements
A strong ETag is an HTTP header field for validation of cached web pages, that indicates a byte-for-byte identical page in the cache.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success