W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > Strong ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of Strong ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
Strong ETag is used by 16.5% of all the websites.
Strong ETag is used by 11.7% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
16.5%
United States
11.7%
Germany
21.1%
Japan
13.2%
France
10.5%
Netherlands
17.2%
Russian Federation
6.2%
United Kingdom
14.6%
Italy
10.0%
Brazil
20.4%
India
28.3%
Poland
12.6%
Singapore
19.1%
Spain
10.7%
Turkey
19.2%
Canada
15.8%
Czech Republic
7.3%
China
18.2%
South Korea
5.8%
Australia
14.6%
Belgium
7.0%
Viet Nam
10.7%
Switzerland
12.6%
Denmark
21.7%
Ireland
11.5%
Finland
16.0%
Iran
10.7%
Indonesia
22.0%
Ukraine
13.3%
Romania
19.8%
Hungary
8.5%
South Africa
11.3%
Sweden
12.4%
Slovakia
5.7%
Lithuania
34.1%
Austria
12.2%
Taiwan
12.4%
Bulgaria
11.8%
Thailand
11.8%
Argentina
18.2%
Malaysia
22.5%
Portugal
5.7%
Belarus
6.3%
Israel
11.6%
Chile
11.5%
Estonia
7.2%
Slovenia
17.3%
Kazakhstan
14.9%
Norway
12.7%
Croatia
8.1%
Greece
11.5%
Cyprus
48.5%
Serbia
15.3%
Bangladesh
13.6%
New Zealand
13.5%
United Arab Emirates
29.5%
Mexico
18.3%
Latvia
9.2%
Moldova
13.2%
Uzbekistan
13.2%
Iceland
18.0%
Georgia
12.3%
Colombia
25.3%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
5.2%
Luxembourg
13.0%
Saudi Arabia
19.0%
Nepal
15.4%
Peru
14.1%
Uruguay
21.4%
Tunisia
19.1%
Pakistan
11.8%
Mongolia
15.2%
Kyrgyzstan
6.9%
Kenya
8.8%
Ecuador
15.9%
Algeria
11.7%
Philippines
19.8%
Egypt
23.2%
Azerbaijan
9.1%
Costa Rica
15.1%
Tanzania
11.5%
North Macedonia
13.0%
Armenia
10.1%
Bahrain
16.1%
Paraguay
13.4%
Bolivia
17.9%
Morocco
21.9%
Nigeria
22.9%
Venezuela
28.9%
Oman
17.3%
Seychelles
0.8%
Jordan
15.7%
Sri Lanka
17.0%
Ethiopia
13.5%
Rwanda
8.8%
Turkmenistan
12.1%
San Marino
2.0%
Albania
13.9%
Qatar
15.8%
Panama
13.1%
Palestine
8.2%
Tajikistan
10.6%
Syria
11.9%
Libya
9.1%
Cambodia
15.5%
Ghana
6.9%
Zambia
7.5%
Cuba
15.1%
Myanmar
13.6%
Kuwait
18.7%
Angola
15.6%
Guatemala
27.5%
Bhutan
7.5%
Lebanon
21.4%
Uganda
12.2%
Namibia
8.1%
Mozambique
10.3%
Cote d'Ivoire
10.7%
Senegal
15.3%
Mauritius
14.3%
Zimbabwe
12.4%
Honduras
30.0%
Dominican Republic
27.0%
Andorra
10.1%
Belize
5.2%
Malta
10.7%
Nicaragua
14.5%
El Salvador
20.0%
Montenegro
13.7%
Monaco
6.9%
Burkina Faso
10.3%
Iraq
18.3%
Cameroon
13.3%
Brunei Darussalam
10.1%
Malawi
8.7%
Liechtenstein
11.9%
Laos
15.5%
Botswana
27.6%
Yemen
6.8%
Madagascar
16.5%
Jamaica
27.4%
Afghanistan
26.2%
Kosovo
13.4%
Benin
12.3%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
0%
Maldives
3.9%
Mali
14.3%
Bahamas
17.6%
Timor-Leste
8.1%
Mauritania
16.4%
Papua New Guinea
10.3%
Cape Verde
10.8%
Suriname
15.4%
Trinidad and Tobago
14.5%
Togo
11.7%
Barbados
8.6%
CuraƧao
30.8%
Lesotho
13.0%
Fiji
6.7%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0%
Gabon
2.5%
Eswatini
16.2%
Somalia
27.8%
Samoa
5.9%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3.1%
North Korea
10.0%
Djibouti
11.1%
Niger
4.2%
Sudan
12.5%
Burundi
9.5%
Gambia
31.6%
Tonga
26.3%
Saint Lucia
11.1%
Guyana
20.0%
Vanuatu
7.1%
Solomon Islands
9.1%
Guinea
30.0%
W3Techs.com, 28 April 2026
Percentages of websites using Strong ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
Strong ETag
Category: Site Elements
A strong ETag is an HTTP header field for validation of cached web pages, that indicates a byte-for-byte identical page in the cache.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success