W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 29.4% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 48.0% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
29.4%
United States
48.0%
Germany
34.2%
Japan
21.2%
France
14.9%
Netherlands
23.5%
Russian Federation
13.6%
United Kingdom
18.1%
Brazil
22.5%
Italy
13.0%
India
35.0%
Poland
15.4%
Singapore
26.1%
Spain
13.7%
Turkey
21.0%
Canada
20.5%
Czech Republic
9.8%
Switzerland
25.2%
China
37.4%
Australia
18.2%
South Korea
7.9%
Belgium
11.9%
Iran
15.3%
Viet Nam
20.6%
Denmark
24.1%
Ireland
24.2%
Finland
22.2%
Indonesia
25.3%
Ukraine
18.2%
Romania
20.7%
Hungary
10.7%
South Africa
13.9%
Sweden
18.8%
Lithuania
41.6%
Slovakia
10.7%
Austria
17.0%
Taiwan
17.6%
Thailand
16.7%
Bulgaria
13.1%
Argentina
22.5%
Malaysia
26.2%
Portugal
8.4%
Belarus
10.6%
Chile
14.0%
Israel
13.4%
Estonia
9.4%
Slovenia
18.9%
Kazakhstan
25.4%
Cyprus
59.1%
Norway
15.5%
Croatia
9.3%
Greece
16.1%
Serbia
18.2%
Bangladesh
16.4%
New Zealand
16.7%
Mexico
20.7%
Latvia
15.0%
Moldova
22.5%
United Arab Emirates
49.0%
Uzbekistan
26.3%
Georgia
17.3%
Iceland
23.1%
Colombia
30.9%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.6%
Nepal
21.9%
Luxembourg
18.4%
Saudi Arabia
25.7%
Peru
18.8%
Uruguay
24.9%
Tunisia
25.4%
Kyrgyzstan
14.9%
Mongolia
24.1%
Pakistan
17.8%
Kenya
13.9%
Ecuador
22.1%
Algeria
22.6%
Egypt
29.3%
Azerbaijan
14.2%
Philippines
31.1%
Costa Rica
20.9%
North Macedonia
18.0%
Tanzania
23.2%
Armenia
17.1%
Paraguay
22.7%
Seychelles
11.1%
Bolivia
28.2%
Nigeria
31.6%
Morocco
28.3%
Venezuela
31.6%
Oman
33.6%
Jordan
17.9%
Ethiopia
33.5%
Sri Lanka
24.1%
Rwanda
17.3%
Panama
18.2%
Albania
15.5%
Turkmenistan
28.2%
San Marino
3.1%
Tajikistan
16.5%
Libya
12.8%
Palestine
20.2%
Qatar
26.4%
Syria
28.2%
Cambodia
23.8%
Ghana
9.7%
Zambia
10.9%
Myanmar
21.9%
Angola
21.6%
Uganda
23.0%
Kuwait
23.7%
Guatemala
35.3%
Cuba
23.7%
Mozambique
17.3%
Bhutan
15.1%
Mauritius
17.6%
Lebanon
25.6%
Bahrain
25.8%
Zimbabwe
18.6%
Cote d'Ivoire
12.3%
Namibia
15.5%
Senegal
20.7%
Belize
28.2%
Dominican Republic
29.5%
Honduras
41.0%
Andorra
15.4%
Burkina Faso
16.8%
Montenegro
22.5%
Malta
16.7%
Monaco
19.4%
Nicaragua
17.1%
El Salvador
24.2%
Cameroon
21.6%
Liechtenstein
16.3%
Brunei Darussalam
12.4%
Iraq
28.4%
Botswana
32.3%
Malawi
15.0%
Laos
25.8%
Yemen
13.3%
Madagascar
24.3%
Afghanistan
31.1%
Jamaica
35.8%
Marshall Islands
7.5%
Benin
31.5%
Kosovo
14.1%
Mali
17.1%
Maldives
29.9%
Bahamas
25.0%
Mauritania
19.7%
Timor-Leste
21.3%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
2.7%
Suriname
16.2%
Cape Verde
16.9%
Togo
15.4%
Papua New Guinea
14.1%
Trinidad and Tobago
24.2%
CuraƧao
34.6%
Lesotho
14.0%
Fiji
10.9%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2.4%
Barbados
12.5%
Gabon
5.0%
Somalia
54.1%
Samoa
8.6%
Sudan
17.6%
Eswatini
27.3%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
12.9%
Niger
13.3%
Djibouti
10.3%
North Korea
15.4%
Gambia
30.4%
Burundi
9.5%
Tonga
27.8%
Saint Lucia
17.6%
Solomon Islands
15.4%
Vanuatu
7.7%
Guyana
16.7%
Haiti
50.0%
Dominica
30.0%
Guinea
40.0%
W3Techs.com, 25 July 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success