W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 30.0% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 49.1% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
30.0%
United States
49.1%
Germany
35.7%
Japan
21.4%
France
15.0%
Netherlands
23.9%
Russian Federation
14.3%
United Kingdom
18.2%
Brazil
22.0%
Italy
13.1%
India
33.9%
Poland
16.0%
Singapore
26.5%
Spain
14.2%
Turkey
21.8%
Canada
20.6%
Czech Republic
10.3%
China
37.9%
Iran
16.7%
Switzerland
23.8%
South Korea
8.2%
Australia
18.5%
Belgium
11.9%
Viet Nam
21.1%
Denmark
24.5%
Ireland
26.5%
Finland
22.7%
Indonesia
24.8%
Ukraine
18.5%
Lithuania
45.6%
Romania
20.9%
Hungary
11.0%
South Africa
14.1%
Sweden
19.2%
Slovakia
11.4%
Austria
18.2%
Thailand
17.0%
Taiwan
17.8%
Bulgaria
13.3%
Argentina
23.1%
Malaysia
26.9%
Belarus
12.6%
Portugal
8.6%
Cyprus
61.5%
Chile
14.4%
Israel
13.8%
Estonia
9.8%
Kazakhstan
27.2%
Slovenia
19.2%
Norway
15.8%
Croatia
9.5%
Greece
16.3%
Serbia
18.7%
Bangladesh
16.2%
New Zealand
17.2%
Mexico
20.4%
Moldova
27.4%
Latvia
15.5%
United Arab Emirates
50.1%
Uzbekistan
27.6%
Georgia
17.4%
Iceland
23.7%
Nepal
22.0%
Colombia
30.3%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.6%
Saudi Arabia
26.2%
Luxembourg
17.9%
Peru
19.5%
Uruguay
24.5%
Tunisia
25.9%
Kyrgyzstan
14.8%
Pakistan
18.7%
Mongolia
24.6%
Kenya
14.0%
Ecuador
23.4%
Algeria
21.9%
Egypt
29.8%
Philippines
32.0%
Azerbaijan
14.7%
Costa Rica
20.3%
North Macedonia
18.1%
Tanzania
20.6%
Armenia
16.3%
Paraguay
22.1%
Seychelles
11.0%
Bolivia
28.6%
Nigeria
32.4%
Morocco
27.3%
Venezuela
32.8%
Ethiopia
33.7%
Oman
29.1%
Jordan
20.6%
Sri Lanka
24.3%
Panama
16.5%
Rwanda
19.6%
Albania
14.3%
Libya
14.0%
San Marino
3.0%
Turkmenistan
28.7%
Tajikistan
18.6%
Qatar
29.3%
Syria
28.5%
Palestine
20.6%
Cambodia
23.7%
Ghana
12.1%
Zambia
10.6%
Angola
23.1%
Myanmar
23.4%
Uganda
24.3%
Kuwait
24.0%
Zimbabwe
16.7%
Guatemala
35.8%
Mozambique
18.9%
Mauritius
16.4%
Lebanon
26.9%
Cuba
23.1%
Bhutan
16.5%
Namibia
15.5%
Senegal
22.1%
Cote d'Ivoire
11.5%
Dominican Republic
33.5%
Bahrain
26.4%
Monaco
15.1%
Honduras
42.4%
Burkina Faso
19.4%
Andorra
18.1%
Malta
17.0%
Montenegro
22.6%
Cameroon
24.5%
Nicaragua
20.4%
El Salvador
25.5%
Iraq
27.7%
Malawi
13.1%
Brunei Darussalam
12.5%
Belize
16.4%
Laos
27.8%
Botswana
31.5%
Yemen
13.2%
Liechtenstein
16.4%
Marshall Islands
6.8%
Madagascar
28.1%
Afghanistan
33.3%
Jamaica
34.4%
Benin
31.5%
Mali
15.1%
Bahamas
27.2%
Kosovo
17.3%
Mauritania
19.0%
Maldives
30.8%
Papua New Guinea
10.8%
Timor-Leste
25.7%
Togo
15.9%
Cape Verde
20.6%
Suriname
16.4%
Trinidad and Tobago
17.7%
CuraƧao
32.7%
Lesotho
10.6%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
9.3%
Gabon
5.0%
Somalia
50.0%
Eswatini
23.7%
Fiji
10.8%
Barbados
13.9%
Samoa
5.7%
Sudan
17.6%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
9.1%
Niger
12.1%
Djibouti
10.3%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
0%
Gambia
29.2%
Burundi
9.5%
North Korea
14.3%
Tonga
26.3%
Saint Lucia
33.3%
Solomon Islands
14.3%
Guyana
23.1%
Vanuatu
8.3%
Guinea
45.5%
Haiti
54.5%
Dominica
30.0%
W3Techs.com, 20 September 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success