W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 28.2% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 44.6% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
28.2%
United States
44.6%
Germany
31.5%
Japan
20.9%
France
14.1%
Netherlands
21.4%
Russian Federation
12.2%
United Kingdom
18.3%
Italy
12.9%
Brazil
26.5%
India
33.1%
Poland
14.0%
Singapore
25.5%
Spain
13.0%
Turkey
20.2%
Canada
19.9%
Czech Republic
9.4%
China
36.2%
Australia
18.3%
South Korea
8.4%
Belgium
12.2%
Viet Nam
19.7%
Switzerland
17.3%
Denmark
23.6%
Ireland
24.4%
Iran
13.6%
Finland
20.8%
Indonesia
24.4%
Ukraine
17.8%
Romania
20.4%
Hungary
10.0%
South Africa
12.7%
Sweden
18.1%
Slovakia
10.2%
Lithuania
35.2%
Austria
17.0%
Taiwan
17.6%
Thailand
16.3%
Bulgaria
12.7%
Argentina
21.5%
Portugal
8.2%
Malaysia
24.3%
Belarus
8.6%
Israel
12.8%
Chile
13.2%
Estonia
8.5%
Slovenia
18.3%
Kazakhstan
25.6%
Norway
15.4%
Croatia
8.9%
Greece
16.0%
Serbia
17.5%
Bangladesh
15.5%
New Zealand
16.4%
Cyprus
52.2%
United Arab Emirates
32.3%
Mexico
21.9%
Latvia
13.3%
Moldova
17.1%
Uzbekistan
23.4%
Iceland
22.2%
Georgia
13.6%
Colombia
29.7%
Luxembourg
17.3%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.1%
Saudi Arabia
23.5%
Nepal
18.4%
Peru
17.4%
Uruguay
23.8%
Tunisia
24.4%
Pakistan
15.5%
Mongolia
23.1%
Kyrgyzstan
14.9%
Kenya
12.2%
Ecuador
21.5%
Philippines
31.4%
Algeria
20.8%
Egypt
27.9%
Azerbaijan
13.5%
Bahrain
30.2%
Costa Rica
20.3%
Tanzania
13.8%
North Macedonia
18.2%
Armenia
16.4%
Paraguay
22.1%
Bolivia
27.3%
Morocco
27.4%
Nigeria
32.1%
Venezuela
30.8%
Seychelles
12.2%
Jordan
17.7%
Oman
29.4%
Sri Lanka
22.6%
Ethiopia
29.9%
Turkmenistan
26.5%
Albania
16.2%
Rwanda
17.5%
Qatar
20.7%
San Marino
3.1%
Palestine
19.6%
Tajikistan
15.9%
Panama
16.4%
Cambodia
22.0%
Syria
23.8%
Libya
11.0%
Ghana
8.8%
Zambia
10.2%
Cuba
22.4%
Kuwait
21.7%
Myanmar
20.5%
Guatemala
32.4%
Angola
19.9%
Bhutan
12.7%
Lebanon
24.5%
Uganda
20.3%
Namibia
15.7%
Mozambique
11.9%
Senegal
19.2%
Cote d'Ivoire
13.8%
Mauritius
16.5%
Zimbabwe
17.9%
Honduras
36.6%
Belize
26.1%
Dominican Republic
30.8%
Andorra
18.4%
Malta
18.8%
Nicaragua
16.9%
El Salvador
25.3%
Monaco
18.8%
Montenegro
22.5%
Iraq
26.3%
Burkina Faso
19.3%
Cameroon
19.3%
Brunei Darussalam
13.1%
Liechtenstein
15.2%
Malawi
12.9%
Laos
25.6%
Botswana
36.1%
Yemen
9.7%
Madagascar
22.9%
Jamaica
38.3%
Afghanistan
28.2%
Kosovo
13.4%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
1.2%
Benin
26.9%
Mali
19.7%
Timor-Leste
18.4%
Bahamas
22.7%
Maldives
26.7%
Mauritania
16.9%
Barbados
8.8%
Papua New Guinea
18.2%
Cape Verde
18.5%
Suriname
18.5%
Trinidad and Tobago
18.6%
Togo
15.5%
CuraƧao
28.8%
Fiji
6.7%
Lesotho
11.1%
Eswatini
30.2%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2.4%
Gabon
5.4%
Somalia
57.1%
Samoa
8.8%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
10.0%
North Korea
17.2%
Djibouti
7.4%
Niger
11.5%
Sudan
21.7%
Burundi
13.6%
Gambia
31.6%
Tonga
26.3%
Saint Lucia
25.0%
Vanuatu
7.1%
Guyana
30.8%
Guinea
36.4%
Solomon Islands
18.2%
W3Techs.com, 11 April 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success