W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 29.1% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 47.5% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
29.1%
United States
47.5%
Germany
33.7%
Japan
21.1%
France
14.7%
Netherlands
23.1%
Russian Federation
13.2%
United Kingdom
18.4%
Brazil
22.5%
Italy
13.1%
India
34.5%
Poland
15.2%
Singapore
25.7%
Spain
13.5%
Turkey
20.9%
Canada
20.5%
Czech Republic
9.7%
China
37.1%
Switzerland
24.1%
Australia
18.1%
South Korea
7.8%
Belgium
11.9%
Viet Nam
20.4%
Ireland
23.3%
Iran
14.2%
Denmark
24.0%
Finland
22.0%
Indonesia
25.1%
Ukraine
18.0%
Romania
20.7%
Hungary
10.6%
South Africa
13.6%
Sweden
18.6%
Lithuania
39.9%
Slovakia
10.5%
Austria
16.9%
Taiwan
17.6%
Thailand
16.6%
Bulgaria
13.0%
Argentina
22.3%
Malaysia
25.7%
Portugal
8.3%
Belarus
9.6%
Chile
13.9%
Israel
13.3%
Estonia
9.2%
Slovenia
18.7%
Kazakhstan
24.6%
Cyprus
57.5%
Norway
15.4%
Croatia
9.2%
Greece
16.1%
Serbia
18.0%
Bangladesh
16.3%
New Zealand
16.5%
Mexico
21.4%
United Arab Emirates
51.8%
Latvia
15.0%
Moldova
19.2%
Uzbekistan
25.6%
Iceland
23.1%
Georgia
16.2%
Colombia
30.9%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.4%
Luxembourg
18.5%
Nepal
21.3%
Saudi Arabia
25.3%
Peru
18.4%
Uruguay
24.9%
Tunisia
25.7%
Mongolia
24.1%
Pakistan
17.4%
Kyrgyzstan
15.0%
Kenya
13.6%
Ecuador
22.0%
Algeria
22.1%
Philippines
29.5%
Azerbaijan
13.9%
Egypt
28.6%
Costa Rica
21.0%
North Macedonia
17.9%
Tanzania
24.9%
Armenia
16.3%
Paraguay
23.1%
Bolivia
27.6%
Nigeria
31.7%
Venezuela
32.3%
Morocco
28.6%
Seychelles
12.0%
Oman
34.9%
Jordan
17.6%
Sri Lanka
22.9%
Ethiopia
31.6%
Panama
17.2%
Rwanda
16.5%
San Marino
3.3%
Turkmenistan
28.2%
Albania
15.4%
Tajikistan
15.7%
Palestine
20.1%
Libya
11.8%
Qatar
25.4%
Syria
28.2%
Cambodia
23.8%
Ghana
10.8%
Zambia
10.3%
Myanmar
21.2%
Kuwait
24.4%
Uganda
22.8%
Cuba
21.8%
Guatemala
35.3%
Angola
20.9%
Bhutan
14.2%
Lebanon
26.0%
Mauritius
16.0%
Mozambique
14.1%
Bahrain
26.0%
Namibia
15.4%
Cote d'Ivoire
12.2%
Belize
27.3%
Senegal
20.4%
Zimbabwe
18.3%
Dominican Republic
29.8%
Honduras
39.9%
Andorra
15.5%
El Salvador
23.6%
Malta
17.0%
Burkina Faso
18.3%
Montenegro
22.6%
Monaco
19.4%
Nicaragua
16.4%
Cameroon
21.2%
Liechtenstein
16.9%
Brunei Darussalam
12.3%
Iraq
26.8%
Botswana
33.3%
Malawi
14.2%
Laos
26.4%
Yemen
12.5%
Madagascar
25.2%
Afghanistan
31.4%
Jamaica
36.6%
Benin
29.9%
Kosovo
13.1%
Mali
18.3%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
1.2%
Bahamas
25.0%
Maldives
28.0%
Timor-Leste
21.3%
Mauritania
17.8%
Suriname
16.2%
Cape Verde
16.7%
Togo
15.9%
Trinidad and Tobago
24.6%
Papua New Guinea
15.0%
CuraƧao
35.3%
Lesotho
16.3%
Fiji
11.4%
Marshall Islands
7.0%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2.4%
Barbados
12.5%
Gabon
5.0%
Somalia
52.6%
Samoa
8.6%
Eswatini
27.3%
Sudan
15.2%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
13.8%
Djibouti
10.3%
Niger
11.1%
North Korea
15.4%
Burundi
9.1%
Gambia
33.3%
Tonga
26.3%
Saint Lucia
17.6%
Solomon Islands
15.4%
Vanuatu
7.7%
Guinea
41.7%
Guyana
16.7%
Haiti
41.7%
W3Techs.com, 3 July 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success