W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 28.0% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 44.2% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
28.0%
United States
44.2%
Germany
31.4%
Japan
20.8%
France
14.0%
Netherlands
21.6%
Russian Federation
12.0%
United Kingdom
18.0%
Italy
12.9%
Brazil
27.0%
India
33.1%
Poland
13.9%
Singapore
25.3%
Spain
12.8%
Turkey
20.0%
Canada
19.7%
Czech Republic
9.3%
China
36.0%
Australia
18.3%
South Korea
8.3%
Belgium
13.1%
Switzerland
19.7%
Viet Nam
19.5%
Iran
13.7%
Denmark
23.4%
Ireland
24.2%
Finland
20.6%
Indonesia
24.3%
Ukraine
17.8%
Romania
20.1%
Hungary
10.0%
South Africa
12.4%
Sweden
17.9%
Lithuania
35.3%
Slovakia
10.2%
Austria
17.1%
Taiwan
17.5%
Bulgaria
13.2%
Thailand
16.1%
Argentina
21.4%
Portugal
8.2%
Malaysia
24.1%
Belarus
8.5%
Israel
12.6%
Chile
12.8%
Estonia
8.5%
Slovenia
18.3%
Kazakhstan
23.9%
Norway
15.2%
Croatia
8.9%
Greece
16.0%
Serbia
17.3%
Bangladesh
15.3%
New Zealand
16.5%
United Arab Emirates
32.8%
Mexico
21.8%
Latvia
13.0%
Cyprus
51.2%
Moldova
16.9%
Uzbekistan
23.1%
Iceland
22.0%
Luxembourg
17.8%
Georgia
13.2%
Colombia
28.8%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.1%
Saudi Arabia
22.5%
Nepal
18.3%
Peru
17.4%
Uruguay
23.5%
Tunisia
24.3%
Pakistan
15.4%
Mongolia
22.7%
Kyrgyzstan
14.4%
Kenya
12.1%
Ecuador
21.4%
Philippines
32.0%
Algeria
19.1%
Egypt
27.4%
Azerbaijan
12.9%
Bahrain
30.1%
Costa Rica
19.6%
Tanzania
10.5%
North Macedonia
18.1%
Armenia
16.1%
Paraguay
21.9%
Bolivia
27.4%
Morocco
26.1%
Nigeria
31.5%
Venezuela
30.5%
Seychelles
12.3%
Jordan
17.6%
Sri Lanka
22.2%
Oman
27.8%
Ethiopia
29.7%
Albania
15.3%
Turkmenistan
25.7%
Qatar
20.3%
Rwanda
17.9%
Palestine
19.3%
San Marino
3.2%
Tajikistan
15.2%
Panama
15.6%
Cambodia
22.3%
Syria
22.7%
Libya
9.6%
Ghana
9.1%
Zambia
9.8%
Cuba
22.3%
Kuwait
21.7%
Guatemala
32.5%
Myanmar
19.0%
Angola
19.7%
Lebanon
25.1%
Bhutan
12.0%
Uganda
19.3%
Namibia
16.8%
Mozambique
10.7%
Cote d'Ivoire
12.3%
Senegal
19.1%
Mauritius
16.4%
Zimbabwe
18.1%
Belize
27.1%
Honduras
36.3%
Dominican Republic
31.9%
Andorra
17.2%
Malta
18.3%
Nicaragua
17.6%
Montenegro
21.7%
El Salvador
25.6%
Monaco
18.9%
Iraq
26.3%
Cameroon
18.8%
Burkina Faso
18.7%
Brunei Darussalam
13.1%
Liechtenstein
15.2%
Laos
24.4%
Malawi
11.5%
Botswana
36.1%
Yemen
10.3%
Madagascar
23.2%
Jamaica
37.2%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
1.2%
Kosovo
13.1%
Afghanistan
27.7%
Benin
25.6%
Maldives
26.9%
Bahamas
20.0%
Mali
17.3%
Timor-Leste
20.0%
Barbados
8.1%
Mauritania
17.1%
Cape Verde
17.9%
Suriname
18.2%
Papua New Guinea
17.5%
Trinidad and Tobago
20.3%
Togo
15.5%
CuraƧao
27.5%
Eswatini
28.3%
Fiji
4.5%
Lesotho
11.4%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2.4%
Gabon
5.4%
Somalia
55.9%
Samoa
9.4%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
12.9%
North Korea
17.2%
Niger
14.3%
Djibouti
7.4%
Sudan
21.7%
Burundi
13.6%
Gambia
31.6%
Tonga
26.3%
Saint Lucia
18.8%
Vanuatu
7.1%
Guyana
30.8%
Guinea
33.3%
Solomon Islands
18.2%
W3Techs.com, 21 March 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success