W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 28.9% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 47.0% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
28.9%
United States
47.0%
Germany
33.2%
Japan
21.1%
France
14.6%
Netherlands
22.5%
Russian Federation
13.1%
United Kingdom
18.6%
Brazil
23.4%
Italy
13.1%
India
34.4%
Poland
14.8%
Singapore
25.6%
Spain
13.4%
Turkey
20.8%
Canada
20.4%
Czech Republic
9.6%
China
37.0%
South Korea
7.9%
Australia
17.9%
Switzerland
23.0%
Belgium
11.8%
Viet Nam
20.2%
Denmark
24.1%
Ireland
24.1%
Finland
21.8%
Iran
12.6%
Indonesia
25.0%
Ukraine
18.1%
Romania
20.6%
Hungary
10.5%
South Africa
13.4%
Sweden
18.5%
Lithuania
39.1%
Slovakia
10.4%
Austria
16.9%
Taiwan
17.6%
Bulgaria
12.9%
Thailand
16.5%
Argentina
22.1%
Malaysia
25.8%
Portugal
8.3%
Belarus
9.2%
Chile
13.8%
Israel
13.3%
Estonia
9.1%
Slovenia
18.5%
Kazakhstan
23.9%
Norway
15.5%
Cyprus
56.6%
Croatia
9.2%
Greece
15.9%
Serbia
18.0%
Bangladesh
15.9%
New Zealand
16.5%
United Arab Emirates
44.5%
Mexico
21.9%
Latvia
15.1%
Moldova
19.7%
Uzbekistan
25.2%
Iceland
22.6%
Colombia
30.4%
Georgia
14.8%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.1%
Luxembourg
18.1%
Saudi Arabia
25.0%
Nepal
20.3%
Peru
18.5%
Uruguay
24.8%
Tunisia
25.5%
Mongolia
23.7%
Pakistan
17.5%
Kyrgyzstan
15.5%
Kenya
13.1%
Ecuador
21.8%
Algeria
21.7%
Philippines
30.3%
Egypt
28.9%
Azerbaijan
13.6%
Costa Rica
20.4%
North Macedonia
18.2%
Tanzania
23.8%
Armenia
15.8%
Paraguay
23.0%
Bolivia
26.7%
Venezuela
32.5%
Morocco
28.0%
Nigeria
31.4%
Oman
32.9%
Seychelles
11.7%
Jordan
17.9%
Ethiopia
31.9%
Sri Lanka
22.9%
Panama
16.7%
Rwanda
16.7%
Turkmenistan
27.6%
Albania
16.1%
San Marino
3.3%
Tajikistan
16.0%
Palestine
19.9%
Qatar
25.1%
Libya
11.1%
Syria
26.7%
Cambodia
23.1%
Ghana
10.6%
Zambia
10.9%
Bahrain
25.2%
Cuba
21.9%
Myanmar
20.6%
Kuwait
24.6%
Guatemala
35.1%
Uganda
22.5%
Bhutan
14.6%
Angola
22.6%
Lebanon
26.2%
Mozambique
13.1%
Namibia
15.3%
Cote d'Ivoire
12.4%
Mauritius
16.7%
Senegal
19.9%
Zimbabwe
18.3%
Dominican Republic
28.6%
Belize
24.5%
Honduras
38.0%
Andorra
15.4%
El Salvador
22.3%
Burkina Faso
18.8%
Montenegro
23.2%
Malta
17.2%
Nicaragua
17.2%
Monaco
18.6%
Cameroon
21.7%
Iraq
28.1%
Liechtenstein
17.1%
Brunei Darussalam
12.4%
Malawi
14.6%
Botswana
33.8%
Laos
27.3%
Yemen
11.9%
Madagascar
23.9%
Afghanistan
29.9%
Jamaica
37.9%
Benin
29.9%
Kosovo
12.9%
Mali
16.9%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
1.2%
Bahamas
26.0%
Maldives
27.3%
Timor-Leste
21.3%
Mauritania
16.7%
Suriname
17.4%
Cape Verde
16.7%
Trinidad and Tobago
22.7%
Papua New Guinea
15.9%
Togo
16.4%
CuraƧao
35.3%
Lesotho
15.2%
Fiji
7.1%
Gabon
4.8%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2.4%
Somalia
55.3%
Barbados
10.8%
Samoa
8.8%
Eswatini
28.1%
Sudan
18.8%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
13.3%
Djibouti
11.1%
Niger
11.5%
North Korea
15.4%
Burundi
10.0%
Gambia
30.0%
Tonga
26.3%
Marshall Islands
11.1%
Saint Lucia
17.6%
Guyana
15.4%
Vanuatu
7.7%
Guinea
41.7%
Solomon Islands
16.7%
Haiti
27.3%
W3Techs.com, 13 June 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success