W3Techs
advertise here
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Technologies

Content Management
Server-side Languages
Client-side Languages
JavaScript Libraries
CSS Frameworks
Web Servers
Web Panels
Operating Systems
Web Hosting
Data Centers
Reverse Proxies
DNS Servers
Email Servers
SSL Certificate Authorities
Content Delivery
Traffic Analysis Tools
Advertising Networks
Tag Managers
Social Widgets
Site Elements
Structured Data
Markup Languages
Character Encodings
Image File Formats
Top Level Domains
Server Locations
Content Languages

Related Reports

Segmentation

Technologies > Site Elements > ETag > by Server Locations

Usage of ETag as site element broken down by server locations

This diagram shows the percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

How to read the diagram:
ETag is used by 27.2% of all the websites.
ETag is used by 42.8% of all the websites that use United States as server location.

Overall
27.2%
United States
42.8%
Germany
30.8%
Japan
20.5%
France
13.3%
Netherlands
20.8%
Russian Federation
11.6%
United Kingdom
17.0%
Italy
12.4%
Brazil
25.5%
India
31.9%
Poland
13.3%
Singapore
24.6%
Spain
12.3%
Turkey
19.2%
Canada
18.8%
Czech Republic
8.9%
China
35.0%
Australia
16.6%
South Korea
7.9%
Belgium
12.3%
Viet Nam
18.6%
Switzerland
18.9%
Iran
12.0%
Ireland
22.5%
Denmark
23.0%
Finland
20.3%
Indonesia
23.7%
Ukraine
17.4%
Romania
18.1%
Hungary
9.7%
Sweden
17.5%
South Africa
12.1%
Slovakia
10.1%
Lithuania
33.8%
Austria
17.3%
Bulgaria
14.1%
Taiwan
17.3%
Thailand
15.5%
Argentina
21.1%
Portugal
8.2%
Malaysia
22.8%
Belarus
8.1%
Israel
12.0%
Chile
12.5%
Estonia
8.2%
Slovenia
18.1%
Kazakhstan
22.1%
Norway
14.8%
Croatia
9.1%
Greece
16.1%
Serbia
17.1%
New Zealand
17.0%
Bangladesh
15.5%
Latvia
12.6%
Mexico
21.6%
United Arab Emirates
28.5%
Moldova
15.8%
Uzbekistan
22.5%
Iceland
21.5%
Luxembourg
16.4%
Georgia
12.6%
Colombia
26.7%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7.2%
Saudi Arabia
21.8%
Nepal
17.0%
Peru
16.5%
Uruguay
23.6%
Tunisia
23.3%
Pakistan
15.0%
Mongolia
21.9%
Kyrgyzstan
13.9%
Kenya
11.5%
Philippines
32.0%
Ecuador
20.7%
Bahrain
28.9%
Algeria
17.5%
Azerbaijan
11.9%
Egypt
25.5%
Costa Rica
19.7%
Tanzania
7.8%
North Macedonia
17.5%
Armenia
14.9%
Paraguay
22.1%
Cyprus
15.9%
Bolivia
25.5%
Morocco
24.2%
Nigeria
30.3%
Venezuela
29.0%
Seychelles
11.5%
Jordan
17.2%
Sri Lanka
22.2%
Ethiopia
27.9%
Oman
25.5%
Turkmenistan
25.5%
Albania
14.9%
Qatar
19.2%
Rwanda
16.2%
San Marino
3.0%
Tajikistan
14.7%
Palestine
16.2%
Panama
14.9%
Syria
20.1%
Cambodia
21.1%
Libya
9.7%
Ghana
7.5%
Zambia
8.3%
Kuwait
19.8%
Cuba
22.5%
Guatemala
31.4%
Myanmar
15.9%
Angola
19.4%
Lebanon
23.4%
Bhutan
11.2%
Mozambique
9.9%
Namibia
15.6%
Uganda
18.3%
Belize
27.9%
Senegal
17.8%
Cote d'Ivoire
13.2%
Mauritius
15.7%
Zimbabwe
18.4%
Andorra
17.7%
Honduras
34.3%
Dominican Republic
27.4%
Malta
18.0%
El Salvador
24.1%
Monaco
17.9%
Montenegro
21.7%
Nicaragua
16.4%
Cameroon
17.3%
Iraq
25.7%
Burkina Faso
20.3%
Brunei Darussalam
12.9%
Malawi
10.6%
Liechtenstein
15.5%
Laos
22.4%
Yemen
10.1%
Botswana
35.1%
Madagascar
19.2%
Jamaica
33.7%
Afghanistan
32.9%
Holy See (Vatican City State)
3.6%
Kosovo
12.3%
Maldives
25.0%
Timor-Leste
18.4%
Bahamas
20.3%
Mali
16.4%
Benin
25.0%
Mauritania
16.7%
Suriname
16.7%
Cape Verde
20.0%
Papua New Guinea
18.3%
Trinidad and Tobago
20.0%
Togo
15.5%
Barbados
10.4%
CuraƧao
29.8%
Fiji
4.4%
Lesotho
11.4%
Eswatini
25.0%
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2.5%
Gabon
5.4%
Somalia
52.9%
Samoa
9.7%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
13.8%
North Korea
17.9%
Sudan
23.1%
Niger
12.5%
Burundi
13.0%
Djibouti
13.0%
Gambia
27.8%
Tonga
29.4%
Saint Lucia
18.8%
Vanuatu
7.1%
Guyana
25.0%
Guinea
20.0%
Solomon Islands
20.0%
W3Techs.com, 9 February 2026
Percentages of websites using ETag broken down by server locations

Share this page

Technology Brief
ETag
Category: Site Elements
The ETag (entity tag) is an HTTP header field, that allows a browser to validate a cached web page, and thus may save bandwidth.
Website: rfc-editor.org/...


advertise here

About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2026 Q-Success