W3Techs Logo
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Blog Categories

All

News
24/7 Real Media
51.la
AddThis
AddToAny
AdRiver
AdRoll
AdTaily
Adtech
Advertising Networks
Adzerk
AngularJS
Apache
ASP.NET
ASP.NET Ajax
AT Internet
AudienceScience
Baidu Analytics
Baidu Promote
Baidu Share
Bitrix
Blogger
BlueKai
BuySellAds
CDNJS
CentOS
Character Encodings
Chartbeat
Chitika
Client-side Languages
CNZZ
ColdFusion
Commission Junction
Comodo
Compression
Concrete5
Content Delivery
Content Languages
Content Management
Cookies
CPM Star
CSS
DataLife Engine
Debian
Delicious
Digg
DigiCert
Discuz!
Dojo
DotNetNuke
DoubleClick
Drupal
Effective Measure
Ektron
EPiServer CMS
ETag
ExoClick
Facebook
Fedora
Flash
Frameset
Full Circle Studies
Gemius
Gentoo
GIF
GlobalSign
Gomez
Google +1
Google AdSense
Google Analytics
Google Libraries API
Google Servers
GoSquared
Gunicorn
Histats
HitTail
HTML
HubSpot
IBM Servers
Image File Formats
Infolinks
InterRed
IP.Board
IPv6
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript Libraries
Joomla
JQuery
JQuery CDN
KISSmetrics
Knockout
Liferay
Linezing
LinkedIn
Linux
LiteSpeed
LiveInternet
Lotame
Markup Languages
Microsoft Advertising
Microsoft-IIS
Mixpanel
MooTools
Movable Type
MySpace
Nginx
Nielsen NetRatings
Node.js
NQcontent
Omniture
Operating Systems
Oracle Servers
OsCommerce
Perl
Persistent Cookies
PHP
PHP Link Directory
Pinterest
Piwik
Pligg
Plone
PNG
PrestaShop
Prototype
Python
Quantcast
Red Hat
Revolver Maps
Ruby
Scientific Linux
Script.aculo.us
Server-side Languages
SharePoint
ShareThis
ShinyStat
Silverlight
Site Elements
Sitefinity
Smart AdServer
Snoobi
Social Widgets
SPDY
SPIP
Squarespace
SSL Certificate Authorities
StatCounter
StumbleUpon
SwissSign
Symantec Group
Top Level Domains
Traffic Analysis Tools
Twitter
TYPO3
Ubuntu
UCoz
Unix
Urchin
UTF-8
VBulletin
Verizon
Web Servers
Webs
Webtrends
Whos.amung.us
Windows
WordPress
WordPress Stats
XHTML
XpressEngine
Yahoo Advertising
Yandex.Direct
Yandex.Metrika
YUI Library
Zanox
Zedo
Zope

How much of the web is adult-oriented? ... 5.9%

Posted by Matthias Gelbmann on 26 May 2010 in

Summary:

As a by-product of analyzing the technologies of lots of websites, we classify them as adult-oriented or family safe. This gives us an estimate of the size of the adult web.

Other surveys

There are a number of surveys published on that subject. Their results range from 1% adult sites to 12%. Unfortunately, they don't give details on how the research was done, which makes it difficult to compare with our results. The presentation of the 12% survey gives the impression that the researchers were more drawn into the subject of study than into the statistical aspects of it. We have to admit: It's certainly more inventive than our little report.

What is an adult site anyway?

When calculating a percentage of adult websites, two seemingly trivial questions need to be addressed: what is adult-oriented, and what is a website.

What is considered adult-oriented depends of course very much on personal attitude and cultural standards. We try to match the mainstream judgment of the Western culture. That is not because we believe that it is the only valid yardstick, but because it happens to be our culture, and we feel comfortable making decisions based on that.

What is considered a website in our surveys might also be different to other statistics: we consider subdomains not to be separate websites. E.g. all the wordpress.com and blogspot.com subdomains are not counted. We also do not count redirected domains. E.g. live.com redirects to bing.com these days. It is not counted. Furthermore we restrict the statistics to the top 1 million websites, in order to limit the impact of domain spamming.

Why we make a distinction

We do not include adult sites in the technology surveys where we show popular sites and random examples of sites using a particular technology. Also, we don't include adult sites when we notify users which subscribed for technology change notifications. In the website information reports we do not show descriptions of adult sites and we do not insert an active link to the sites.

We make the distinction for two reasons. First, we do not want our visitors to stumble over adult sites, when they are looking for something completely different. And second, most advertisers don't want their ads to be shows in the vicinity of adult-oriented material.

By the way, we do include adult sites in the technology survey statistics, as we don't want content to have an impact on the number of technology usage.

How do we know which sites are adult-oriented?

Alexa includes an adult flag in their site info API, which we use. Unfortunately, we found that this is not sufficient, because the classification is wrong more often than we would accept. Therefore we do our own research by scanning the sites for any content that is typical for adult sites and re-classify them if necessary. Occasionally, we find sites that are classified incorrectly also by our own scanner. In that case, we try to adapt our algorithms so that it covers more and more cases. We also do manual classifications, but rarely and only if we cannot find a way to do it automatically. We did not have to change our algorithm for a while, which makes us confident that it is pretty good by now. Still, it is not perfect and we do not claim our figures to be 100% accurate.

And how successful are adult sites?

You probably know that some adult sites are in the top 100 most visited sites, but how successful are they on the whole? We have broken down the overall figure by rankings:

rank percentage of adult sites
top 1.000 6.4%
top 10.000 9.0%
top 100.000 8.7%
top 1.000.000 5.9%

You can see that in the top 10.000 sites the share of adult sites is significantly higher, whereas in the top 1.000 it is lower again, but still more than in the top 1 million. That means, adult sites are doing pretty well, on average better than non-adult sites.

Nevertheless, we have no plans to change the scope of our own site any time soon.

P.S.: Some might think now: "So you have a list of some 60.000 popular adult sites. Could you, um, perhaps, well, actually publish it?" And the answer would be: no.

Share this page




Share |




This entry is closed for comments.


   
W3Techson


Find us on Facebook

W3Techs on LinkedIn

Follow W3Techs on Twitter







About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Publishing Partners Advertising Feedback
Copyright © 2009-2013 Q-Success