W3Techs Logo
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Blog Categories

All

News
24/7 Real Media
51.la
AddThis
AddToAny
AdRiver
AdRoll
AdTaily
Adtech
Advertising Networks
Adzerk
AngularJS
Apache
ASP.NET
ASP.NET Ajax
AT Internet
AudienceScience
Baidu Analytics
Baidu Promote
Baidu Share
Bitrix
Blogger
BlueKai
BuySellAds
CDNJS
CentOS
Character Encodings
Chartbeat
Chitika
Client-side Languages
CNZZ
ColdFusion
Commission Junction
Comodo
Compression
Concrete5
Content Delivery
Content Languages
Content Management
Cookies
CPM Star
CSS
DataLife Engine
Debian
Delicious
Digg
DigiCert
Discuz!
Dojo
DotNetNuke
DoubleClick
Drupal
Effective Measure
Ektron
EPiServer CMS
ETag
ExoClick
Facebook
Fedora
Flash
Frameset
Full Circle Studies
Gemius
Gentoo
GIF
GlobalSign
Gomez
Google +1
Google AdSense
Google Analytics
Google Libraries API
Google Servers
GoSquared
Gunicorn
Histats
HitTail
HTML
HubSpot
IBM Servers
Image File Formats
Infolinks
InterRed
IP.Board
IPv6
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript Libraries
Joomla
JQuery
JQuery CDN
KISSmetrics
Knockout
Liferay
Linezing
LinkedIn
Linux
LiteSpeed
LiveInternet
Lotame
Markup Languages
Microsoft Advertising
Microsoft-IIS
Mixpanel
MooTools
Movable Type
MySpace
Nginx
Nielsen NetRatings
Node.js
NQcontent
Omniture
Operating Systems
Oracle Servers
OsCommerce
Perl
Persistent Cookies
PHP
PHP Link Directory
Pinterest
Piwik
Pligg
Plone
PNG
PrestaShop
Prototype
Python
Quantcast
Red Hat
Revolver Maps
Ruby
Scientific Linux
Script.aculo.us
Server-side Languages
SharePoint
ShareThis
ShinyStat
Silverlight
Site Elements
Sitefinity
Smart AdServer
Snoobi
Social Widgets
SPDY
SPIP
Squarespace
SSL Certificate Authorities
StatCounter
StumbleUpon
SwissSign
Symantec Group
Top Level Domains
Traffic Analysis Tools
Twitter
TYPO3
Ubuntu
UCoz
Unix
Urchin
UTF-8
VBulletin
Verizon
Web Servers
Webs
Webtrends
Whos.amung.us
Windows
WordPress
WordPress Stats
XHTML
XpressEngine
Yahoo Advertising
Yandex.Direct
Yandex.Metrika
YUI Library
Zanox
Zedo
Zope

Changes in client-side programming languages surveys

Posted by Sam Soltano on 16 June 2011 in News, Client-side Languages

Summary:

We stopped publishing the market share data in the client-side programming languages surveys. They were no longer useful.

We used to show both usage data and market share data in our client-side programming languages surveys.

We found that the surveys benefit from dropping the market share data for two reasons:

First, JavaScript had a "market share" of almost 100%. That means that almost all the sites that used any client-side programming language, also used JavaScript. The consequence of that was, that the market share values in the various reports were the same as the usage data, just 10% higher (JavaScript us used by 90% of the sites). Therefore, that value gave little extra information, and was just a source of confusion.

Second, some of the reports, such as the Ranking Breakdown report were based on market share data. Since this was always near 100% for JavaScript, one could not see the differences in the various ranking groups. In the new form of the report (the current form), we see that JavaScript is used more by high-traffic sites compared to average sites (96.9% vs. 89.5%), whereas Flash is used less (25.8% vs. 27.3%). That was not so clearly visible before.

It is rare, that leaving out data makes a survey better, but we think that is the case here.

_________________
Please note, that all trends and figures mentioned in that article are valid at the time of writing. Our surveys are updated frequently, and these trends and figures are likely to change over time.

Share this page




Share |




This entry is closed for comments.


   
W3Techson


Find us on Facebook

W3Techs on LinkedIn

Follow W3Techs on Twitter







About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Publishing Partners Advertising Feedback
Copyright © 2009-2013 Q-Success